Comparative trial of stent-like balloon angioplasty versus coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction.

Primary PTCA has been shown to be superior to any thrombolytic regimen and offers higher reperfusion rates and better coronary flow grades. Its limitations include recurrent ischemia (10%-15%), infarct-related artery reocclusion (5%-10%), angiographic restenosis (35%-50%), and need to perform repeat PTCA or CABG at 6-month follow-up (20%). Thus, the current role of coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is very promising. From December 1995 through January 1997, 335 patients underwent primary angioplasty during the first 12 hr from symptom onset at our institution. We performed a retrospective study comparing the in-hospital and 6-month follow-up outcome of 61 patients who underwent coronary stenting (stent group) against 61 patients with optimal (residual lesion stenosis < 30%) balloon-only primary angioplasty (stent-like group). Patients were routinely treated with aspirin, and ticlopidine was given only to the stent group. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate was 11.5% without statistical differences between the groups. Cardiac death rate was similar in both groups (4.9 vs. 6.6%; P = 1.0) and only two (3.3%) patients from the stent group and none from the PTCA group had nonfatal myocardial reinfarction. At 6-month follow-up, the rate of recurrent angina was higher in the stent-like group (30.9 vs. 7.1%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that only stenting of the infarct-related artery was a borderline independent predictor for MACE (OR = 0; 95% CI = 0-1; P = 0.057). Primary stenting for AMI reduces the rate of recurrent angina or symptoms and MACE at 6-month follow-up.

[The benefit of a coronary stent in the reduction of major cardiac complications in acute coronary syndromes]. / Beneficio del stent coronario en la reducción de complicaciones cardiacas mayores en síndromes coronarios agudos.

To assess the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE), we analyzed 694 procedures in 613 consecutive patients during one year period. Patient population included 550 (79.2%) patients with unstable angina, 43 (6.2%) with stable angina and 101 (14.5%) with acute myocardial infarction. Elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was performed in 593 (85.4%) patients, rescue PTCA in 7 (1%), and primary PTCA in 94 (13.5%). Angiographic lesion morphology was as follows: type A 30%; type B 58%; type C 12%. We compared patient population who received stent with PTCA-balloon only. Technical success was 95% and clinical success was achieved in 80% of the cases. Overall mortality was 1% in the stent group and 3% in the conventional PTCA. The incidence of MACE was 4% and 15.1% in the stent and angioplasty balloon groups respectively. We found a dramatic impact on reduction of the incidence of acute complications in the groups with stenting for unstable angina (p = 0.0001) and acute myocardial infarction (p = 0.0001). The major clinical advantage of stenting over balloon angioplasty was a lower need for repeated procedures.

Myocardial contrast and transesophageal echocardiographic study of the left coronary artery from the main pulmonary artery.

A case of a 26-year-old woman with thoracic pain and anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the main pulmonary artery is described. The diagnosis was by coronary angiography and complemented with Doppler and transesophageal myocardial contrast.

[Coronary stent in acute myocardial infarction]. / Stent coronario en el infarto agudo del miocardio.

UNLABELLED: From December 1995 to March 1997 fifty patients with acute myocardial infarction, had 57 stents implanted. Mean time since the beginning of symptoms to the procedure was 3.7 +/- 2.9 hours. Twenty-four stents were implanted "de novo", 17 for "sub-optimal" results, 5 for threatened closure and eleven for complex dissection. The arteries treated with stent were left anterior descending in 42%, right coronary in 42%, circumflex in 10%, vein grafts in 4%, intermedial branch in 1% and marginal obtuse branch in 1%. Stent used in most of the cases was AVE in 67% followed by Palmaz-Schatz, Wiktor, Crown, Gianturco-Roubin and Wallstent. Before procedure, coronary flow was TIMI 0 in 66% TIMI 1 in 10% and TIMI 2 in 24%. After procedure, TIMI 3 coronary flow was achieved in 92% of the arteries and other four had "no-reflow" phenomenon. Mean stenosis before procedure was 96% +/- 3.1 and after stenting was 1.76% +/- 2.6 with a stent/artery diameter rate of 1.01. Technical success was 100% and clinical success was achieved in 96% of the cases. Two cases were not successfully due to acute thrombotic closure in one patient and in another one because of cardiogenic shock after two days of a technical successful implantation of stent in LAD artery. There were not recurrent ischemic events (CABG, re-infarction or new coronary angioplasty procedure). Other two patients died for non-cardiac events (acute pancreatitis in one and by septic shock in other). At the time of discharge 96% of patients were treated with aspirin and ticlopidine. Major hematoma was evident in only one case. At a mean follow-up time of 5.6 months +/- 4.2 in 45 patients showed that 73% were in functional class I and none of them had re-infarction, death or needed a new revascularization. CONCLUSION: Stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction is feasible and safe procedure with a low rate of ischemic recurrent events.

[Primary angioplasty: comparison of working hours and night]. / Angioplastía primaria: comparación entre los horarios matutino y nocturno.

A prospective, observational, comparative study of 100 patients with acute myocardial infarction and primary angioplasty was performed to establish if there was statistically difference between the lag of time when symptoms begin and the time of the emergency admission to the time of arrival at the catheterization suite during working hours vs the "on call" hours. Patients were allocated in two groups accordingly to morning hours or on call hours. Time of onset of symptoms to the catheterization suite arrival between the two groups was no significantly different. Time from emergency room arrival to catheterization suite arrival was significant different < 0.05, however success rate between groups 86% vs 80% and complications rate were statistically non significant between both groups. We conclude that primary angioplasty is a highly effective method of reperfusion. Even though the time from the emergency room arrival to the catheterization suite arrival was significantly less during day than the on call hours, there is no difference between the success rate and complications incidence in both groups.

[Coronary stents. Results during the hospitalization phase]. / Stent coronario. Resultados en fase hospitalaria.

UNLABELLED: Between October 1991 and August 1996 two-hundred coronary stents were implanted (s) in 166 patients (pts) (1.27 s/pt). One hundred thirty-five lesions "de novo" were approached with stent, 44 because of a sub-optimal result post-angioplasty, 15 for restenosis and 17 for dissection. In thirty-six patients the indication of stenting was stable angina, in 68 unstable angina, in 37 for angina after myocardial infarction, in 11 for asymptomatic ischemia after myocardial infarction and in 14 during an acute myocardial infarction. Mean stenosis before stent implantation in all cases was 85 +/- 15%. Type of lesion in seventy cases was A, in 112 was B and 29 was C. Stents used were AVE in 146 lesions, Palmaz-Schatz in 33, Wiktor in 23, Gianturco-Roubin in 8 and Wallstent in one case. Medical treatment in 140 pts. (84.3%) after stent implantation was only with aspirin and ticlopidine. Technical success in all patients was 98.6% (208/211 pts) and primary success was 94.6% (157-166 pts). Unsuccessful procedures were because of sub-acute occlusion in three patients (1.8%), death in 3 pts. (1.8%) and urgent CABG was necessary in one pt. (0.5%). Major hematoma was a complication in 5 pts (3%). Mean residual stenosis after stent implantation in all cases was 2.2%. CONCLUSION: Stent implantation in our laboratory is a very safe procedure with a high rate of primary success with lowest complications in a great population of unstable angina.

[Percutaneous valvulotomy for calcified aortic valve stenosis in the adult]. / Valvulotomía percutánea en la estenosis aórtica valvular calcificada del adulto.

This study describes the initial experience of the Instituto Nacional de Cardiología "Ignacio Chávez", with percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty for calcified aortic valve stenosis in adults. Five patients, 4 males and a female (mean age 54 +/- 7 years), were included. All of them had poor ventricular function, and were not surgical candidates. Although it is in fact a small group, the results are promising, with a success rate of 80%, and without mortality. In only one case, the transvalvular gradient could not be modified.